{"id":758361,"date":"2019-09-28T08:09:38","date_gmt":"2019-09-28T12:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=758361"},"modified":"2019-09-28T08:09:57","modified_gmt":"2019-09-28T12:09:57","slug":"why-wont-usda-enforce-the-animal-welfare-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=758361","title":{"rendered":"Why won’t USDA enforce the Animal Welfare Act?"},"content":{"rendered":"\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Actual USDA enforcement has been replaced with 'courtesy visits', 'teachable moments', and 'Incentives'. Moreover, the USDA no longer mandates that veterinary care plans be signed by an actual veterinarian.<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\n

CATHY LISS:<\/strong> ‘At Wilson\u2019s Wild Animal Park, a notorious roadside zoo in Winchester, Va., Himalayan black bears lived huddled together on a concrete floor in a chain-link pen. Tigers were denied the opportunity to run, climb or splash in the water. A single rope separated Indian antelope from visitors. One keeper was responsible for 175 animals. According to USDA data, the zoo racked up more than 80 animal welfare citations from federal inspectors between 2004 and 2017. Yet, that didn\u2019t stop the USDA from rubber-stamping the facility\u2019s license renewals year after year.<\/em><\/p>\n

Last month, the 43-year-old zoo abruptly closed after state and local law enforcement officials seized more than 100 animals from the property. On Aug. 29 \u2014 after hearing testimony that Wilson\u2019s kept dead lemurs in the same freezer as ice cream, among other atrocities \u2014 a district court judge barred the park\u2019s owner from reclaiming the animals, citing cruel treatment and neglect. One unanswered question looms over this expos\u00e9 of cruelty: Why didn\u2019t the federal government shut down this abysmal establishment?<\/em><\/p>\n

The USDA\u2019s Animal Care unit regulates more than 10,000 breeders, dealers, zoos, circuses and research laboratories under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). The entire AWA enforcement infrastructure \u2014 inspections, long-standing policies, fines and public accountability \u2014 is in shambles. And gleaning what is happening is no small task given the USDA\u2019s buried data and the anonymity granted to much of the industry…<\/em><\/p>\n

Nationwide, actual enforcement of a 53-year-old law has been replaced with \u201ccourtesy visits,\u201d \u201cteachable moments,\u201d and \u201cincentives.” Moreover, the USDA gutted a policy that required licensed operations to comply with American Veterinary Medical Association euthanasia guidelines (which presumably would allow animals to be killed by other means, including blunt force trauma or gunshot), and no longer mandates that veterinary care plans be signed by an actual veterinarian…<\/em><\/p>\n

After scrubbing all animal welfare records from its website two years, the USDA \u201crestored\u201d access with heavy redactions and a crippled, ineffective search engine. The Animal Welfare Institute analysis found from January 2016 to June 2019, the USDA removed 97 percent of the names and other identifying information of licensed breeders, including puppy mills, from nearly 10,800 inspections…<\/em><\/p>\n

When the AWA is enforced properly, it can prevent immeasurable suffering… But no more. No more documenting noncompliance in inspection reports, no more solid enforcement (to protect and serve as a deterrent), and no bold actions to rescue animals who are suffering. USDA inspectors are the first line of defense for animals covered by the modest requirements of the AWA. The agency must restore their authority and resume publishing unredacted records to regain public trust’.<\/em> SOURCE…<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

RELATED VIDEO:<\/strong><\/p>\n