{"id":760425,"date":"2020-05-05T07:54:48","date_gmt":"2020-05-05T11:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=760425"},"modified":"2020-05-05T08:10:48","modified_gmt":"2020-05-05T12:10:48","slug":"dead-end-rather-than-cull-millions-of-livestock-lets-end-animal-agriculture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=760425","title":{"rendered":"DEAD END: Rather than ‘Cull’ Millions of Livestock, Let\u2019s End Animal Agriculture"},"content":{"rendered":"\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

The virus has given us an opportunity to look directly into the eyes of our fellow beings. We will have failed them if, when restrictions begin to lift, we avert our eyes to their suffering.<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\n

JOSEPH WINTERS:<\/strong> As the U.S. economy reels from the COVID-19 pandemic, the country\u2019s meat producers are facing a logistical disaster… With nowhere to send their chickens, pigs, and cows, farmers have been overwhelmed by a growing glut of animals within their crowded production facilities. Now, facing pressure to \u201cdepopulate,\u201d they have begun to slaughter their livestock populations by the millions… By a conservative estimate, 2 million animals have already died in these ways, and many more will perish in the coming weeks… Faced with overcrowding, farmers are presented with two options: limiting the growth of their animal populations (via induced abortions or withholding food to limit the animals\u2019 physical size), or \u201cdepopulation,\u201d also known as culling (pick your euphemism).<\/p>\n

For the latter, there are many methods available… Companies may choose to cover their flocks in a layer of foam, which blocks the birds\u2019 airways and gradually suffocates them… ventilation shutdown, which induces organ failure as temperatures rapidly rise, as an appropriate form of euthanasia… Pigs may be killed by other means, including \u201cgunshot, captive bolt, electrocution, and injection of anesthetic overdose.\u201d One method called \u201cblunt force trauma,\u201d otherwise simply known as \u201cthumping,\u201d is specifically recommended for baby pigs, whereby the piglets are slammed headfirst into the ground. But the pandemic provides an opportunity to more deeply interrogate the structural injustice of this system.<\/p>\n

It is animal agriculture that is wrong, not simply the logistical phenomena that have caused mass culling. As we negotiate a return to normalcy, we must critically examine and dismantle the country\u2019s unsustainable and unethical meat production pipeline… It is an opportunity to ask more probing questions about the nature of our system of animal agriculture. If what we do best is slaughter animals, will returning to that system be any less tragic? What is the material difference between sending millions of animals to their untimely deaths due to the coronavirus, before they are fully fattened, and sending over 50 billion animals annually to the slaughterhouse under the status quo?<\/p>\n

The only consistent logic, as Matthew Scully writes in a breathtaking article comparing China\u2019s \u201cwet\u201d animal markets to the United States\u2019 factory farms, is that our fundamental relationship with animals is based on domination. \u201cThe most basic animal needs are always to be subordinated to the most trivial human desires,\u201d he says. Beyond this underlying rule, there is no coherence in the moral framework with which we regard and treat animals. Our perceptions are circumstantial, invoking justice in some cases but disregarding it in others. The differences are frivolous and arbitrary: The suffering of a pangolin in a Chinese wet market is abominable, but that of an American pig is inconsequential. The culling of two million chickens is gut-wrenching under pandemic circumstances; normally, their demise is unexceptional.<\/p>\n

If America\u2019s animals could make it to the market, would their suffering then be defensible? We have developed a justificatory framework that says yes: Human benefit legitimates the erasure and subversion of animals\u2019 inherent status as living beings. But this twisted reasoning is malleable, and we can still choose compassion over dominion… In the long term, we must not waste this opportunity to start mending our broken relationship with animals. This begins with the end of factory farming and the redirection of all government relief and future subsidies towards plant-based agriculture and food processing. These kinds of systemic solutions are the only way to truly show compassion to animals. The virus has given us an opportunity to look, for a moment, directly into the eyes of our fellow beings. We will have failed them if, when restrictions begin to lift, we avert our eyes to their suffering.\u00a0 SOURCE…<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

RELATED VIDEO:<\/strong><\/p>\n