{"id":764870,"date":"2021-09-15T08:28:13","date_gmt":"2021-09-15T12:28:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=764870"},"modified":"2021-09-15T08:53:55","modified_gmt":"2021-09-15T12:53:55","slug":"natural-enemies-environmental-ngos-oppose-animal-rights-campaigners-efforts-to-ban-animal-testing-in-eu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=764870","title":{"rendered":"TOXIC FRIENDS: Environmental NGOs oppose animal rights campaigners’ efforts to end animal testing in the EU"},"content":{"rendered":"\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Environmental groups like World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and Friends of the Earth support the safety certification of certain cosmetics that require that chemicals companies use animal testing.<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\n

LEONIE CATER:<\/strong> A campaign to end animal testing in the EU is creating an unusual alliance of animal rights activists and industry both calling for a comprehensive ban while environmental campaigners warn of the danger of halting all such tests.<\/em><\/p>\n

Animal testing for cosmetic purposes was \u2014 with a few exceptions \u2014 banned under EU law in 2009. A ban on all animal testing came into force in 2013. But a rather large loophole remains: Under the EU’s flagship chemicals regulation, REACH, the safety certification of certain cosmetic ingredients still requires that chemicals companies use animal testing.<\/em><\/p>\n

Activists, industry and policymakers now want to close that gap and move away from animal testing entirely. On Wednesday, MEPs will vote on whether to ask the European Commission to draw up a plan to phase out all animal testing in science, training and research and ramp up funding for alternative, non-animal testing methods.<\/em><\/p>\n

The measure is expected to pass, as all political groups \u2014 from the conservative European People’s Party (EPP) to the Greens \u2014 have voiced their support. The motion is not legally binding on the Commission but could influence upcoming proposals for its revision of classification, labeling and packaging regulations.<\/em><\/p>\n

Humane Society International estimates “millions” of animals have died as a result of REACH. In an emailed statement, Unilever claimed it “can already say that we no longer need animal testing to assess the safety of our products and ingredients across our portfolio” and “fully supports” Parliament\u2019s initiative.<\/em><\/p>\n

Environmental groups, meanwhile, say that although they support the goal of reducing animal testing such an out-and-out ban would compromise safety testing. Instead, authorities should \u201clook into ways to better use the data they have\u201d and “regulate compounds of concern faster while also promoting less use of animals,\u201d said Natacha Cingotti of the Health and Environment Alliance, an NGO…<\/em><\/p>\n

Animal rights organizations and environmental NGOs have not seen eye-to-eye on the issue for years. Since its inception in 2006, REACH \u2014 which obliges companies to prove their chemical is safe before they can put it on the market \u2014 has come under fire from animal rights activists for its dependence on laboratory animals. PETA labeled it the \u201clargest animal testing [program] in the world.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Environmental groups like World Wide Fund for Nature-founded ChemSec, meanwhile, welcomed REACH as \u201ca bold and progressive framework for regulating and restricting the use of the most hazardous substances.\u201d Now, animal rights activists are being bolstered by support from industry, which is eager to phase out animal testing requirements.<\/em><\/p>\n

Cosmetics brands The Body Shop and Unilever’s Dove joined up with NGOs including PETA and Cruelty Free Europe last month to call on the EU to strengthen the bloc’s cosmetics animal testing ban and work toward a worldwide ban by 2023. The EU’s regulations are “very outdated” and fail to account for advances in non-animal testing, said Julia Fentem, head of the Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre at Unilever.<\/em> SOURCE…<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

RELATED VIDEOS:<\/strong><\/p>\n