{"id":766520,"date":"2021-12-31T08:40:40","date_gmt":"2021-12-31T13:40:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=766520"},"modified":"2021-12-31T09:03:00","modified_gmt":"2021-12-31T14:03:00","slug":"karen-davis-does-guilt-have-a-place-in-animal-rights-activism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=766520","title":{"rendered":"Karen Davis: Does guilt have a place in animal rights activism?"},"content":{"rendered":"\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Guilt can be motivating along with pity and remorse and the uplift of deciding to wash one's hands of contributing further to an abuse, and in this way transform the guilt incurred when one behaved less mindfully.<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\n

KAREN DAVIS:<\/strong> The fact that animals are suffering and dying for appetites that can be satisfied in many other ways makes some people, perhaps many, uncomfortable, though not necessarily because of guilt. People get annoyed that you\u2019re bothering them, trying to curtail their freedom and uncover a guilt they may not feel or feel strongly enough, so that some end up feeling \u201cguilty\u201d because they don\u2019t feel guilty, just vexed that they\u2019re being victimized.<\/em><\/p>\n

If animals are largely overlooked in the range of human endeavors, is it any wonder that their suffering is barely accorded human knowledge, and that it makes sense to speak of the \u201csecret\u201d and \u201chidden\u201d suffering of animals? Even so, many people regard pain and suffering as morally objectionable and would agree with the Reverend Dr. Humphry Primatt, who wrote in 1776, \u201cPain is Pain, whether it be inflicted on man or on beast; and the creature that suffers it, whether man or beast, being sensible of the misery of it whilst it lasts, suffers Evil”…<\/em><\/p>\n

Animal advocates struggle with how to get people to care enough about animals to do more than just passively agree that animals shouldn\u2019t be made to suffer. Speaking of activist efforts in China in words with global applicability, Mercy For Animals\u2019 president, Leah Garc\u00e9s, was recently quoted in Why the future of animal welfare lies beyond the West: \u201cI think we have to keep throwing spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks. We have not cracked the code. Nobody has.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Should the \u201cspaghetti\u201d we throw include an effort to induce consciousness of guilt in people who are in a position to make a positive difference for animals in their personal lives? B.R. Myers wrote in The Atlantic, in 2007, in Hard to Swallow: The gourmet\u2019s ongoing failure to think in moral terms: \u201cTry forcing most Americans to consider the suffering of the animals they consume, and they will conclude . . . that the whole exercise has more to do with punishment than persuasion.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

As for encouraging people to feel guilty about contributing without reasonable cause to the suffering and death of a fellow creature, I think guilt is an appropriate and even a necessary feeling to have toward one\u2019s innocent victims, as long as it empowers rather than impairs the ability to think and act better as a result. Guilt can be motivating along with pity and remorse and the uplift of deciding to wash one’s hands of contributing further to an abuse, and in this way transform the guilt incurred when one behaved less mindfully. SOURCE…<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

RELATED VIDEOS:<\/strong><\/p>\n