{"id":774730,"date":"2024-01-24T07:44:02","date_gmt":"2024-01-24T12:44:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=774730"},"modified":"2024-01-24T08:23:15","modified_gmt":"2024-01-24T13:23:15","slug":"treating-them-like-animals-presenting-a-case-for-animal-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=774730","title":{"rendered":"‘Treating them like animals’: Presenting a case for animal rights"},"content":{"rendered":"\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

When people are treated monstrously, we say they are \u2018treated like animals\u2019. This is because we treat animals monstrously. Most of us believe that we are \u2018more equal\u2019 than other animals. We regard our claim to dominion as a license to treat animals as disposable objects, with no or negligible concern for their lives or well-being. The total number of land animals killed for meat every year comes to roughly 82 billion, more than 2,500 animals per second, not including the tens of billions of fish. Against this backdrop of thought, the typical responses to veganism appear puzzling and unsettling. Some say, \u2018I\u2019m not a vegan. After all, what I eat is my personal choice, and what you eat is yours\u2019. A personal choice. Is it really?<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\n

RAINER EBERT:<\/strong> When people are treated monstrously, we say they are \u201ctreated like animals.\u201d This is because we treat animals monstrously. We mistreat and abuse them on farms, transport them in cramped and stressful conditions, torture them in laboratories, hunt them for sport, and use them for our entertainment in circuses and zoos. You know that, I know that, everyone knows that. And yet, the horror continues, and it continues on a scale that is truly mind-boggling.<\/em><\/p>\n

The vast majority of animals used by humans are used for food. According to the latest data available from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 332 million cows, 501 million goats, 604 million turkeys, 617 million sheep, 1.4 billion pigs, 4.3 billion ducks, and 73.8 billion chickens are killed for meat every year.<\/em><\/p>\n

This list does not include the tens of billions of fish we eat every year, the male chicks that are killed in the egg industry, and the laying hens and other animals the food industry exploits in ways other than killing them for meat. The total number of land animals killed for meat every year comes to roughly 82 billion — more than 2,500 animals per second…<\/em><\/p>\n

When we talk about animals, we often forget that we too are animals. One reason why we forget this simple fact is that, much like George Orwell\u2019s pigs in Animal Farm, most of us believe that we are \u201cmore equal\u201d than other animals. Philosophers refer to this attitude of superiority as speciesism. They say it is speciesist to give more moral weight to our interests than the interests of nonhuman animals, just like it is sexist to favour the interests of men over women.<\/em><\/p>\n

This definition, however, does not capture the massive magnitude of our bias. Our speciesism is nothing short of pernicious. The sheer number of animals we are willing to make suffer and kill so that we can have a steak rather than protein-rich tofu, beans, or lentils suggests that we don\u2019t think of our fellow animals as half as, or 10 times less important than us.<\/em><\/p>\n

Even if the life of a cow or a chicken was a hundred times less important than yours or mine, we would hardly be justified in ending it for the trivial pleasure of eating meat. Rather, we regard our claim to dominion as a license to treat animals as disposable objects, with no or negligible concern for their lives or well-being.<\/em><\/p>\n

As we learn more and more about how little difference there is between humans and other animals, our claim to dominion over other species seems increasingly dubious. They experience and navigate the world around them, and they exist for their own sake. They can feel, and they don\u2019t want to suffer. They want to live, and they don\u2019t want to die. These interests, to be free from suffering and not to be killed, are vital, and it is hard to escape the conclusion that they cannot possibly be outweighed by the comparatively trivial human interest in consuming meat and other animal products.<\/em><\/p>\n

Against this backdrop of thought, the typical responses to veganism appear puzzling and unsettling. There are the shrugs and the smirks — smug or evasive, it\u2019s hard to tell. And then there is the seeming indifference to the horrors of modern animal farming, as if those horrors were banalities, perfectly normal. Often, these are the reactions from otherwise compassionate, well-meaning, and morally-conscious people. \u201cYour reasons to abstain from animal products are good reasons, but they are your reasons, and they don\u2019t apply to me,\u201d they say. \u201cI\u2019m not a vegan. After all, what I eat is my personal choice, and what you eat is yours.\u201d A personal choice. Is it really? <\/em>SOURCE…<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

RELATED VIDEO:<\/strong><\/p>\n