{"id":775385,"date":"2024-04-22T08:22:14","date_gmt":"2024-04-22T12:22:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=775385"},"modified":"2024-04-22T09:09:40","modified_gmt":"2024-04-22T13:09:40","slug":"experts-declare-insects-and-other-invertebrate-animals-have-consciousness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=775385","title":{"rendered":"CONSCIOUS (R)EVOLUTION: Experts declare insects and other invertebrate animals have consciousness"},"content":{"rendered":"\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

The new declaration formally acknowledges that consciousness may also be widespread among animals that are very different from humans, including invertebrates and other animals with completely different and far simpler nervous systems. It updates the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness published in 2012, which said that an array of nonhuman animals, including but not limited to mammals and birds, have the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors and that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness.<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\n

DAN FALK:<\/strong> In 2022, researchers at the Bee Sensory and Behavioral Ecology Lab at Queen Mary University of London observed bumblebees doing something remarkable: The diminutive, fuzzy creatures were engaging in activity that could only be described as play. Given small wooden balls, the bees pushed them around and rotated them. The behavior had no obvious connection to mating or survival, nor was it rewarded by the scientists. It was, apparently, just for fun.<\/em><\/p>\n

The study on playful bees is part of a body of research that a group of prominent scholars of animal minds cited today, buttressing a new declaration that extends scientific support for consciousness to a wider suite of animals than has been formally acknowledged before. For decades, there\u2019s been a broad agreement among scientists that animals similar to us \u2014 the great apes, for example \u2014 have conscious experience, even if their consciousness differs from our own. In recent years, however, researchers have begun to acknowledge that consciousness may also be widespread among animals that are very different from us, including invertebrates with completely different and far simpler nervous systems.<\/em><\/p>\n

The new declaration, signed by biologists and philosophers, formally embraces that view. It reads, in part: \u201cThe empirical evidence indicates at least a realistic possibility of conscious experience in all vertebrates (including all reptiles, amphibians and fishes) and many invertebrates (including, at minimum, cephalopod mollusks, decapod crustaceans and insects).\u201d Inspired by recent research findings that describe complex cognitive behaviors in these and other animals, the document represents a new consensus and suggests that researchers may have overestimated the degree of neural complexity required for consciousness.<\/em><\/p>\n

The four-paragraph New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness<\/a> was unveiled today, April 19, at a one-day conference called \u201cThe Emerging Science of Animal Consciousness\u201d being held at New York University. Spearheaded by the philosopher and cognitive scientist Kristin Andrews of York University in Ontario, the philosopher and environmental scientist Jeff Sebo of New York University, and the philosopher Jonathan Birch of the London School of Economics and Political Science, the declaration has so far been signed by 39 researchers, including the psychologists Nicola Clayton and Irene Pepperberg, the neuroscientists Anil Seth and Christof Koch, the zoologist Lars Chittka, and the philosophers David Chalmers and Peter Godfrey-Smith.<\/em><\/p>\n

The declaration focuses on the most basic kind of consciousness, known as phenomenal consciousness. Roughly put, if a creature has phenomenal consciousness, then it is \u201clike something\u201d to be that creature \u2014 an idea enunciated by the philosopher Thomas Nagel in his influential 1974 essay, \u201cWhat is it like to be a bat?\u201d Even if a creature is very different from us, Nagel wrote, \u201cfundamentally an organism has conscious mental states if and only if there is something that it is like to be that organism. \u2026 We may call this the subjective character of experience.\u201d If a creature is phenomenally conscious, it has the capacity to experience feelings such as pain or pleasure or hunger, but not necessarily more complex mental states such as self-awareness.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cI hope the declaration [draws] greater attention to the issues of nonhuman consciousness, and to the ethical challenges that accompany the possibility of conscious experiences far beyond the human,\u201d wrote Seth, a neuroscientist at the University of Sussex, in an email. \u201cI hope it sparks discussion, informs policy and practice in animal welfare, and galvanizes an understanding and appreciation that we have much more in common with other animals than we do with things like ChatGPT”…<\/em><\/p>\n

The new declaration updates the most recent effort to establish scientific consensus on animal consciousness. In 2012, researchers published the\u00a0Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness<\/a>, which said that an array of nonhuman animals, including but not limited to mammals and birds, have \u201cthe capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors\u201d and that \u201chumans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The new declaration expands the scope of its predecessor and is also worded more carefully, Seth wrote. \u201cIt doesn\u2019t try to do science by diktat, but rather emphasizes what we should take seriously regarding animal consciousness and the relevant ethics given the evidence and theories that we have.\u201d He wrote that he is \u201cnot in favor of avalanches of open letters and the like,\u201d but that he ultimately \u201ccame to the conclusion that this declaration was very much worth supporting”. SOURCE…<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

RELATED VIDEO:<\/strong><\/p>\n