{"id":781187,"date":"2026-05-20T09:20:31","date_gmt":"2026-05-20T13:20:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=781187"},"modified":"2026-05-20T09:31:14","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T13:31:14","slug":"animal-rights-lawyers-file-court-order-to-free-remaining-ridglan-farms-beagles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/animalrightswatch.us\/?p=781187","title":{"rendered":"FREE THEM ALL: Animal rights lawyers file court order to protect remaining Ridglan Farms beagles"},"content":{"rendered":"

Attorneys from the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) and the Animal Activist Legal Defense Project (AALDP) appealed the dismissal of a lawsuit seeking to protect the remaining dogs at infamous beagle experimentation breeder Ridglan Farms. They also moved for an injunction prohibiting Ridglan from killing dogs for medically unnecessary reasons pending resolution of the appeal. Ridglan has killed dogs in the past for non-medically necessary reasons. The company did not respond to requests that it confirm it will not kill dogs that remain at its breeding facility. The lawsuit argues that these violate those dogs\u2019 right to be protected from cruelty under Wisconsin law.<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

NHRP:<\/strong> Attorneys from the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) and the Animal Activist Legal Defense Project (AALDP) appealed the dismissal of a lawsuit seeking to protect the remaining dogs at infamous beagle experimentation breeder Ridglan Farms. They also moved for an injunction prohibiting Ridglan from killing dogs for medically unnecessary reasons pending resolution of the appeal, after Ridglan did not respond to a request for confirmation it would not do so. Last month, Ridglan agreed to sell approximately 1,500 dogs to rescue organizations, but that deal did not include all of the dogs at the facility. Approximately 500 remain.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cAll the remaining beagles have a right to be free from cruelty,\u201d said Christopher Berry, executive director of the NhRP. \u201cUntil the Wisconsin Court of Appeals rules on this case, the Nonhuman Rights Project and the Animal Activist Legal Defense Project are simply asking Ridglan Farms not to kill these innocent animals.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

In January, the NhRP and AALDP filed a lawsuit arguing that the dogs have a legal right to be free from cruelty and asking the court to enforce that right via habeas corpus, a time-honored legal tool that protects against unlawful confinement. The trial court dismissed the habeas lawsuit and the animal rights attorneys are now appealing.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cYears of heroic efforts by activists and the hard work of rescue organizations have secured the freedom of 1,500 dogs\u2014but hundreds remain in cruel conditions at Ridglan\u2019s breeding facility, their fate unknown. They deserve to be protected just as much as those who have been released, and we will continue to fight for them,\u201d said Chris Carraway, staff attorney at the Animal Activist Legal Defense Project.<\/em><\/p>\n

Last fall, Ridglan Farms reached an agreement with a special prosecutor to resolve potentially hundreds of felony animal cruelty charges, agreeing to surrender its license to breed and sell dogs by July 1, 2026. However, the agreement does not require Ridglan to make any changes regarding the conditions of the dogs that remain at the puppy mill until then. Additionally, Ridglan has killed dogs in the past for non-medically necessary reasons. The company did not respond to requests that it confirm it will not kill dogs that remain at its breeding facility. The lawsuit argues that these violate those dogs\u2019 right to be protected from cruelty under Wisconsin law. SOURCE<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

RELATED VIDEO:<\/strong><\/p>\n