The court's order authorizing the hippos to exercise their legal right to obtain information in the United States is a critical milestone in the broader animal status fight to recognize that animals have enforceable rights.
SAMANTHA BERLIN: In a historic court ruling, Pablo Escobar’s infamous ‘cocaine hippos’ are now legally considered people in the eye of the law. The decision made comes years after discussion from various authorities to kill off the hippos in an attempt to rid the country of the invasive species. But last July, a Columbian attorney named Luis Domingo Gómez Maldonado filed a lawsuit on behalf of the animals to save them from being killed.
Columbia’s history with the hippos started over three decades ago when Escobar, a Columbian drug lord, smuggled animals into the private zoo on his property. The zoo held elephants, zebras, camels, giraffes, ostriches, and four male and female hippopotamuses.
When Escobar was killed by police in 1993, all of Escobar’s property was seized. The police sent Escobar’s animals off to various zoos but decided to let the hippos stay on the property since authorities believed they wouldn’t be an issue and transport of the animals would prove difficult.
Then the hippos did what any hippo does: they reproduced. Now, close to 120 hippos freely roam some 100 miles from the region’s capital city. The hippos, dubbed the ‘cocaine hippos’, have become a major concern for residents’ safety as well as the environmental impact they can have on the area…
Officials in Columbia announced that they would start giving the hippos a chemical contraceptive to sterilize the main breeding group within the hippo population. So far, about 24 of the hippos have been sterilized with a chemical that will make them infertile. However, in Maldonado’s lawsuit, he pushed for the use of a different contraceptive that was deemed safer.
Recently, the Animal Legal Defense Fund, an animal advocacy organization in the United States, filed a legal application in an attempt to depose two wildlife experts based out of Ohio with expertise on nonsurgical sterilization to testify on behalf of the hippos.
“Animals have the right to be free from cruelty and exploitation, and the failure of U.S. courts to recognize their rights impedes the ability to enforce existing legislative protections,” Stephen Wells, the executive director of the Animal Legal Defense Fund, said. “The court’s order authorizing the hippos to exercise their legal right to obtain information in the United States is a critical milestone in the broader animal status fight to recognize that animals have enforceable rights.”
The organization stated that in granting the application, the court would recognize “the hippos as legal persons with respect to that statute” for the first time in history… Experts believe that this historical court ruling will provide legal precedent for other animals’ legal rights, such as Happy the elephant who resides in the Bronx Zoo. In May the New York Court of Appeals agreed to hear a case from the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP), an animal advocacy group based in Florida, in the fight to grant Happy legal “personhood”. SOURCE…
PRESS RELEASE FROM THE ANIMAL LEAGUE DEFENSE FUND (ALDF):
Today, the Animal Legal Defense Fund announced the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio has recognized animals as legal persons for the first time in the United States.
In pursuit of deposing two wildlife experts with expertise in nonsurgical sterilization who reside in Ohio, the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed an application on behalf of the plaintiffs in a Colombian lawsuit against the country’s government regarding a plan to kill roughly 100 hippos who are descendants of animals imported by Pablo Escobar.
The plaintiffs are the “community of hippopotamuses living in the Magdalena River.” In Colombia, animals have standing to bring lawsuits to protect their interests. In granting the application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to conduct discovery for use in foreign proceedings, the court recognized the hippos as legal persons with respect to that statute.
This U.S. statute allows anyone who is an “interested person” in a foreign litigation to request permission from a federal court to take depositions in the U.S. in support of their foreign case. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that someone who is a party to the foreign case “no doubt” qualifies as an “interested person” under this statute. The Animal Legal Defense Fund reasoned that since the hippos are plaintiffs in the Colombian litigation, they qualify as “interested persons” under this statute.
“Animals have the right to be free from cruelty and exploitation, and the failure of U.S. courts to recognize their rights impedes the ability to enforce existing legislative protections,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “The court’s order authorizing the hippos to exercise their legal right to obtain information in the United States is a critical milestone in the broader animal status fight to recognize that animals have enforceable rights.”
The lawsuit in Colombia was filed on behalf of the hippos by attorney Luis Domingo Gómez Maldonado on July 31, 2020, to save the animals from being killed. While the lawsuit is ongoing, the regional environmental agency involved in addressing the hippo population announced it had started to provide a fraction of the animals with the contraceptive drug GonaCon on October 15, 2021.
It is unknown if the Colombian government’s use of the drug will be safe and effective, and it is also unknown how many hippos the government still intends to kill. The hippos’ lawsuit seeks an order to provide a contraceptive called PZP (porcine zona pellucida), given its historical success in hippos held in zoos and its recommendation by an International Advisory Committee assembled by Animal Balance, an international organization that focuses on sterilization of animals.
In the 1980s, Colombian drug trafficker Pablo Escobar purchased four hippos for his private zoo. After Escobar’s death, the Colombian government left the hippos on his property because it was unable to transport them to a suitable environment. In the years that followed, the hippos escaped the property, relocated to the Magdalena River, and reproduced at a rate that some ecologists consider to be unsustainable.
The testimony of Animal Balance’s wildlife experts, Dr. Elizabeth Berkeley and Dr. Richard Berlinski, will be used to bolster support for the PZP contraceptive to prevent the hippopotamuses who live in the Magdalena River from continuing to grow the population without slaughtering them. The Animal Legal Defense Fund thanks Robert Sparks from Strauss Troy for helping in this matter.